Quality of the Forensic Case Formulation in Mental Health

Authors

  • Jorge O. Folino Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. ORCID 0000-0001-5834-2212
  • Jorge L. Castillo Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. ORCID 0000-0003-2638-2599
  • Lisieux E. De Borba Telles Universidad Federal de Rio Grande do Sul; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brasil. ORCID 0000-0003-4105-5924
  • William A. Jiménez Jiménez Universidad Católica de Colombia, Colombia. ORCID 0000-0002-0309-1281
  • Arturo Klenner Poder Judicial de Chile, Chile. ORCID 000-0002-0103-9869
  • Elizabeth M. León Mayer Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. ORCID 0000-0003-1564-6448
  • Claudio H. Melo Alarcón Servicio Psiquiatría Forense del Instituto Psiquiátrico “Dr. José Horwitz Barak”, Santiago, Chile. ORCID 0000-0002-8874-0390
  • Alfonsina G. Muñiz Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. ORCID 0000-0001-9832-6671
  • Juana V. Ochoa Balarezo Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador. ORCID 0000-0001-5683-6657
  • Susana M. Oleas Gallo Unidad Judicial de Familia, Consejo de la Magistratura, Ecuador. ORCID 0000-0002-1649-6878
  • Maria F. Porteiro Instituto Técnico Forense del Poder Judicial, Uruguay. ORCID 0000-0002-8181-596X
  • Javier A. Velázquez Zilberberg Policía de la provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. ORCID 0000-0003-3320-0183

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v33i156.176

Keywords:

Case forensic formulation, Mental health, Forensic report, Forensic formulation quality, Forensic practice, Reliability

Abstract

Objectives: The “Guide to understand and assess the quality of the case formulation in forensic mental health –TECF” is tested in order to contribute to the development of the forensic reports. Method: Twelve mental health professionals of different Latin American traditions assessed with the TECF the quality of ten international forensic reports, both psychological and psychiatric. The guide includes the manual that describes the dimensions, criteria and guidelines to assess the quality of the forensic case formulation. Results: Internal consistency indicators were in a rank of 0.34- 0.81 for the dimensions and 0.85 for the total TECF. The absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient among  evaluators with similar tradition reached values of 0.72; 0.52; 0.76 and 0.77 for the dimensions and 0.84 for the total.  The agreement among evaluators with different traditions was less. Conclusions: The TECF is a promising instrument to guide the assessment of quality and to stimulate improvement of the forensic reports. Caution is recommended in light of the traditional rating scale method due to the effect that can be produced by the different practices. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-07-10

How to Cite

Folino, J. O., Castillo, J. L. ., De Borba Telles, L. E., Jiménez Jiménez, W. A. ., Klenner, A., León Mayer, E. M., Melo Alarcón, C. H. ., Muñiz, A. G. ., Ochoa Balarezo, J. V. ., Oleas Gallo, S. M., Porteiro, M. F., & Velázquez Zilberberg, J. A. (2022). Quality of the Forensic Case Formulation in Mental Health. Vertex Revista Argentina De Psiquiatría, 33(156, abr.-jun.), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v33i156.176

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.