Pseudobulbar affect in stroke patients in Argentina

Authors

  • Matías Alet Sección de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares, Servicio de Neurología. Hospital “J. M. Ramos Mejía”, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Constanza Segamarchi Sección de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares, Servicio de Neurología. Hospital “J. M. Ramos Mejía”, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Santiago Claverie Sección de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares, Servicio de Neurología. Hospital “J. M. Ramos Mejía”, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Leonardo González Sección de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares, Servicio de Neurología. Hospital “J. M. Ramos Mejía”, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Sandra Lepera Sección de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares, Servicio de Neurología. Hospital “J. M. Ramos Mejía”, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Raúl Rey Sección de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares, Servicio de Neurología. Hospital “J. M. Ramos Mejía”, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v30i148.123

Keywords:

Stroke, Emotion incontinence, Pseudobulbar affect

Abstract

Background: Pseudobulbar affect is defined by involuntary or exaggerated episodes of laughter or crying, subsequent to a specific disease. After-stroke pseudobulbar affect is reported in 11%-34% of patients. In our population is underdiagnosed. Our objective was to determine its frequency in a group of stroke patients. Patients and methods: Prospective observational study from June/2017 to June/2018. Two populations were evaluated: chronic stroke (Group A) and acute stroke (Group B). Patients with severe psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment and/or aphasia were excluded. PLACS (“pathological laughing and crying scale”) and CNS-LS (“lability scale for pseudobulbar affect”) scales were performed. Pseudobulbar affect was defined with diagnostic criteria plus both positive scales. Results: Fifty patients were evaluated. Sixty-eight percent were men. Mean age: 65±12 years. Group A: 19 cases and group B: 31 cases. Positive PLACS: 21% group A and 29% group B. Positive CNS-LS: 58% group A and 26% group B. Both positive scales in 8 patients (2 in group A and 6 in group B). Three of them had associated depression. Conclusions: Pseudobulbar affect should be screened after stroke. Post-stroke depression is frequent and differential diagnose with emotional lability attributable to pseudobulbar affect must be ruled out. The administration of a single scale would not be sufficient for diagnostic guidance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-12-01

How to Cite

Alet, M., Segamarchi, C., Claverie, S. ., González, L., Lepera, S. ., & Rey, R. . (2019). Pseudobulbar affect in stroke patients in Argentina. Vertex Revista Argentina De Psiquiatría, 30(148, nov.-dic.), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v30i148.123